Eye on the Libyan General National Congress: Third Report

[Eye on the GNC logo. Image from ignc.net.ly] [Eye on the GNC logo. Image from ignc.net.ly]

Eye on the Libyan General National Congress: Third Report

By : Jadaliyya Reports

[The following report was issued by Bokra Youth Organization and H2O Team on 28 February 2013. This is the third in a year-long series of reports covering the actions of Libya`s General National Council. This issue focuses on the period from 15 January to 1 February 2013. Click here to access the previous report.]

Eye on the General National Congress: The Third Report

Introduction

On Tuesday evening, 15 January 2013, Mr. Omar Hemedan, the official spokesperson for the General National Congress (GNC), held a weekly press conference to discuss the latest work and updates from the GNC in the past week. The following points came up:

With regards to hearing from the President of the Electoral Commission on the possible outlooks about forming the constituent body to write the constitution, Mr. Hemedan reported that the President of the Commission stated that the election law needs some modifications to comply with the process of electing sixty committee members, should they be elected via direct elections. This election process will take longer time than if the GNC decides to nominate the Constituent Assembly.

Mr. Hemedan additionally reported that there is a dialogue committee in the GNC that is studying the question of how to best form the sixty-member assembly. The dialogue assembly has decided to bring back this discussion to the broader Libyan society for several reasons, one of which is to avoid suspicion. In addition, the committee set a mechanism to consult with members of the society, one of which includes discharging the GNC for two consecutive weeks so a public discussion can occur about whether the sixty-member assembly should be elected or nominated.

The second order of business from the 15 January meeting was about whether to continue discussing the proposal calling for the previous transitional government to be held accountable. Hemedan confirmed that the GNC still cannot properly discuss this issue. The GNC currently has several conflicting opinions on this question, one of which suggests that transitional government officials be questioned by specialized committees in the GNC or by the Audit Bureau.

In addition, Mr. Moez Al-Khoga has taken the legal oath front of the Congress as the Ministry of the General National Congress Affairs. He will therefore serve as the primary liaison and point of contact between the GNC and the government.

Regarding, the visit of the President of the GNC to Italy, he reported that the visit was highly successful. In it he discussed various political, economic and cultural issues with Italian officials.

Finally, Mr. Hemedan reported that there are several committees still working on various issues, including the Political Isolation Committee, which consists of nineteen members. This committee has held four meetings in the past and should complete its work within the coming weeks. The committee has also established a mechanism that includes the participation of different civil institutions. Everyone who has something to contribute should present it to the committee via mail or by contacting the appropriate Congress member for their region.

There is also a committee working on a final version of the GNC`s internal bylaws and regulations. While the committee is responsible for drafting these bylaws, any Congress member can submit a proposal to this committee.

The General National Congress Meetings:

From 20 January through 27 January, the GNC selected to hold secret meetings.

Fifty-Seventh Meeting:

The agenda for 20 January 2013:

  • Introduce the draft resolution which was submitted by the Prime Minister regarding the opening of monthly credits and the need for provisions in accordance with the legislation currently in place.
  • Present the proposal put forward by thirteen members about Article 8th of the Rules of Procedure for the local councils issued by the interim National Transitional Council (No. 176 of 2011). Article 8 states the following: "In all cases, the decision to end memberships will not be valid until it is confirmed by the interim National Transitional Council."
  • Present the proposal submitted by the Committee of Labor and Social Affairs, Youth and Sports, which proposes the addition of a new article to the Social Security Act No. 13 of 1980.
  • Open a discussion about creating policies for members of the constituent body to draft the constitution.

Summary:

  • Approval of the proposal which was submitted by the Prime Minister on a resolution to give the government permission to open monthly temporary credits, based on (1/12) from the 2012 fiscal year for Articles 1, 2, and 4 from the general budget for fiscal year 2013.
  • Transferring the proposal put forward by some members about the amendment of Article 8th of the internal rules of the local councils, by decision No. 176 of 2011, to the Local Government Commission and Legislative commission for consideration. The commissions should report back to the Congress about this amendment.
  • Approval of the proposal submitted by the Committee of Labor and Social Affairs to add a new article to the Social Security Act No. 13 of 1980. This addition states that when there is an increase in the pay of state workers, pensions for retirees will increase by the same percentage in correspondence to the degree of their pension at retirement. Moreover, the pension of assumed pensioners and those with pensioners insurance will increase by a middle amount between the minimum and maximum of the increase that was approved.
  • Continuation of discussions about the regulations and criteria of members of the constituent body to draft the constitution. Congress members suggested many criteria and rules that should be used to form the body. The Social Dialogue Committee will draft the criteria based on what the members proposed and on suggestions that will come up in dialogue sessions held around the country.
  • Agreement to discuss sovereign government positions (Attorney General, the President of the Supreme Court, the Governor of the CBL, Chairman Audit Bureau, the Chief of Staff and head of the General Intelligence Service) during the next meeting. There was also agreement to follow up with previous Congress decisions, as well as with procedures required for the formation of the Electoral Commission. The Electoral Commission will observe the formation of the Constituent Assembly, assuming it will be elected. The Commission will also observe the constitutional referendum.

Fifty-Eighth Meeting:

The agenda for 22 January 2013:

  • Hearing from the Minister of Interior, the President of the General Intelligence, and Chief of the General Staff about the security situation in the country.
  • Discussing the Family Bonus Law.
  • Discussing the proposal presented by thirty-seven Congress members regarding the amendment adopted by the GNC about patrol chairmanship of the permanent commissions.

Summary:

During this meeting, the GNC approved the Family Bonus Law which stipulated that, starting from 1 January  2013, each family head will receive 100 dinars for each child that has not yet reached 18 years of age.

In addition, Mr. Hemedan stated that the Congress listened to the remarks of the Minister of Interior and the Chief of Staff, at the request of the Congress and the Presidential Office to discuss the security situation. They stated that security is not the responsibility of one single state entity, but it is the responsibility of everyone. They also claimed that Libyans should know that it is their responsibility to contribute to the upholding of security within the country. Mr. Hemedan also confirmed that the reason behind security provisions is to begin implementing development plans, providing the necessary services, raising the standard of living for the individuals, and facilitating access of services to citizens. This will be achieved by activating the Local Government Act via municipalities, making these municipalities independent administratively and financially, in order to provide the necessary services to citizens. In the upcoming days, the formal municipalities will be adopted.

Fifty-Ninth Meeting:

The agenda for January 27, 2013:

  • Presenting the Family Bonus Law after the draft`s adjustment by the Legislative and Financial Commission of the Congress.
  • Discussing a law project presented by the Council of Ministers to amend Law No. 59 of 2012 about the system of local administration.
  • Presenting the Prime Minister`s writing directed to the President of the Congress about amending the renaming of three ministries, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of International Cooperation, and the Minister of Higher Education.
  • Presenting a recommendation to the Congress Foreign Affairs Committee about the appointment of each of the following gentlemen as Ambassadors in the Embassies later:
    • Mr. Salah al-Din Muhammad Bashari (Ambassador of Libya to China).
    • Mr. Muftah Ramadan Alteear (Ambassador of Libya to Mexico).
    • Mr. Anwar Abu Bakr Faitouri (Ambassador of Libya to Malaysia).
    • Mr. Sadiq Mohammed Othman Bin Sadiq (Ambassador of Libya to Indonesia).

Sixtieth Meeting:

The agenda for 29 January 2013:

  • Discuss the project presented by the Council of Ministers to amend Law No. 59 of 2012 about the system of local administration.
  • Suggest delegating the Presidency of the Congress to provide a proposal to the GNC on the restructuring of the Electoral Commission.
  • Suggest delegating the president to nominate three members of the Congress to participate in the drafting of the constituent assembly elections law, provided that agreement is reached to elect the assembly.
  • Presenting a recommendation to the Congress Foreign Affairs Committee about the appointment of each of the following gentlemen as Ambassadors in the Embassies later:
    • Mr. Salah al-Din Muhammad Bashari (Ambassador of Libya to China).
    • Mr. Muftah Ramadan Alteear (Ambassador of Libya to Mexico).
    • Mr. Anwar Abu Bakr Faitouri (Ambassador of Libya to Malaysia).
    • Mr. Sadiq Mohammed Othman Bin Sadiq (Ambassador of Libya to Indonesia).

Summary:

Salah El Makhzoom, the Second Deputy Chairman of the GNC, asked GNC members to vote on the project presented by the Council of Ministers to amend Law No. (59) of 2012 about the system of local administration. Mr. El Makhzoom noted that members should vote on each of the project articles individually. If the amendment is rejected, the law retains its original form and the government is committed to it.

In addition, Mr. El Makhzoom stated that any amendment is not confirmed unless it reaches the quorum, as stipulated in the constitutional declaration. The Local Government Act needs 120 votes for any amendment to be approved. If a quorum is not achieved, the proposal stays the same and the government is committed to it from today`s date. One should note that the proposal was rejected after the quorum was not achieved.

Before starting to vote on the first article, a verbal altercation occurred between Mr. Mohammed Maqarief (The President of the Congress) and Mr. Ibrahim Ghariani. Mr. Ghariani stated that the Congress works without an approved internal system, meaning that there is no accountability for any member or for the presidential office because the law does not recognize interim accreditation. He stated that the main concern should be to adopt the internal system so that all members can be made accountable, implying that he would be the first to be subjected to it. In his response, Mr. Mohammed Magarief stated that the decision to adopt the regulation is an interim one that was issued by the Congress, as a whole including Mr.Ibrahim Ghariani himself. He also stated that if Mr. Ghariani was absent, then this is not an excuse. Mr. Mohamed Magarief pointed out that this does not mean that it is a wrong decision, because the decision was made by required majority. He then called on Mr. Gharian to stop his unnecessary, exaggerated speech.

With regards to the second article, Magarief noted that the current actual number of member attendees at this session is ninety-nine members out of the original 190 members. Voting on the second article approved the President of the Congress to present a proposal to the GNC about the restructuring of the Electoral Commission within a week. The approval came about after seventy-four members voted for this proposal.

Magarief was surprised by the variety of statements given by GNC members. He noted that GNC members from one side demanded the need to expedite Electoral Commission matters and the formation of the Elections Commission. However, the Presidency also noted that when they set out to start to show the articles related to the elections and the Higher Electoral Commission, they found skepticism in the process of counting actual attendance and doubt in quorum of the Congress. He explained that the meetings quorum of the Congress is ninety-five members. He was also surprised after one member demanded a re-counting of the actual attendance, while another member questioned the quorum of the Congress, explaining that the quorum of the Congress was not available. In this regard, Mr. Mahmoud Abdel Aziz was astonished by all the noise and fuss about questionings of the count and about the Congress session quorum, explaining that the actual number of attendees at the beginning of the meeting was 124 members, noting that this question affects compatibility in the next stage.

With regards to the third article, the proposed suggestion has approved to nominate three members of the Congress to participate in the drafting of the constituent elections law, provided that that the Constituent Assembly will be elected not nominated.

Mr. Faraj Sassy was surprised about the disappearance of the proposal that was presented by seventy-three members to the Presidency of the Congress to accelerate the application of Article 30 of the Constitutional Declaration. Mr Sassy stated that the proposal was presented last Sunday, but that it was not scheduled for discussion during the day’s session.

On the other hand, Mr. Sassy asked the Presidency of the Congress to stop broadcasting the Congress meetings on air. Mr. Sassy explained that whenever the session is broadcasted live, a large number of speeches and exaggerated speech occurred.

Special Session held on 31 January 2013:

On Thursday, 31 January 2013, the GNC held a special meeting to discuss the performance of the Congress against the backdrop of some of the claims received from some Congress members. The meeting was devoted to particularly address the claims made by the first deputy chairman of the GNC Mr. Juma Ootaiqh, who criticized the general performance of the Congress and the Presidency in particular. The meeting concluded with the idea of formulating an Evaluation and Proposals Committee to improve the performance of Congress, its components and the administrative system. This new committee consists of seven members of the GNC.

Laws Approved by the General National Congress:

The GNC approved the Family Bonus Law which provides 100 LD per head of a family and for each child who has not yet reached eighteen years of age. The Law additionally applies to each unmarried female (even if her age exceeds eighteen), with the only condition being that she does not get paid nor receive a grant from any other source. The Law applies to divorced women as well as to Libyans married to non-Libyan husbands.

Sources:

  • Official website of the General National Congress.
  • Official Facebook page of the Press Office of the General National Congress.
  • Social networking pages for parties and the members of the General National Congress.
  • Eltadamon News Agency.
  • Alanbaa News (Libyan news agency).
  • Alanbaa Newspaper.
  • Arow El bahir News (Libyan news agency).
  • GNC Meetings aired live through National TV.

[Click here to download the full report.]

[Click here to download the report in Arabic.]

  • ALSO BY THIS AUTHOR

    • Emergency Teach-In — Israel’s Profound Existential Crisis: No Morals or Laws Left to Violate!

      Emergency Teach-In — Israel’s Profound Existential Crisis: No Morals or Laws Left to Violate!

      The entire globe stands behind Israel as it faces its most intractable existential crisis since it started its slow-motion Genocide in 1948. People of conscience the world over are in tears as Israel has completely run out of morals and laws to violate during its current faster-paced Genocide in Gaza. Israelis, state and society, feel helpless, like sitting ducks, as they search and scramble for an inkling of hope that they might find one more human value to desecrate, but, alas, their efforts remain futile. They have covered their grounds impeccably and now have to face the music. This is an emergency call for immediate global solidarity with Israel’s quest far a lot more annihilation. Please lend a helping limb.

    • Long Form Podcast Episode 7: Think Tanks and Manufactuing Consent with Mandy Turner (4 June)

      Long Form Podcast Episode 7: Think Tanks and Manufactuing Consent with Mandy Turner (4 June)

      In this episode, Mandy Turner discusses the vital role think tanks play in the policy process, and in manufacturing consent for government policy. Turner recently published a landmark study of leading Western think tanks and their positions on Israel and Palestine, tracing pronounced pro-Israel bias, where the the key role is primarily the work of senior staff within these institutions, the so-called “gatekeepers.”

    • Long Form Podcast: Our Next Three Episodes

      Long Form Podcast: Our Next Three Episodes
      Long Form Podcast(Episodes 7, 8, & 9) Upcoming Guests:Mandy TurnerHala RharritHatem Bazian Hosts:Mouin RabbaniBassam Haddad   Watch Here:Youtube.com/JadaliyyaX.com/Jadaliyya There can be

Past is Present: Settler Colonialism Matters!

On 5-6 March 2011, the Palestine Society at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London will hold its seventh annual conference, "Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine." This year`s conference aims to understand Zionism as a settler colonial project which has, for more than a century, subjected Palestine and Palestinians to a structural and violent form of destruction, dispossession, land appropriation and erasure in the pursuit of a new Jewish Israeli society. By organizing this conference, we hope to reclaim and revive the settler colonial paradigm and to outline its potential to inform and guide political strategy and mobilization.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often described as unique and exceptional with little resemblance to other historical or ongoing colonial conflicts. Yet, for Zionism, like other settler colonial projects such as the British colonization of Ireland or European settlement of North America, South Africa or Australia, the imperative is to control the land and its resources -- and to displace the original inhabitants. Indeed, as conference keynote speaker Patrick Wolfe, one of the foremost scholars on settler colonialism and professor at La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia, argues, "the logic of this project, a sustained institutional tendency to eliminate the Indigenous population, informs a range of historical practices that might otherwise appear distinct--invasion is a structure not an event."[i]

Therefore, the classification of the Zionist movement as a settler colonial project, and the Israeli state as its manifestation, is not merely intended as a statement on the historical origins of Israel, nor as a rhetorical or polemical device. Rather, the aim is to highlight Zionism`s structural continuities and the ideology which informs Israeli policies and practices in Palestine and toward Palestinians everywhere. Thus, the Nakba -- whether viewed as a spontaneous, violent episode in war, or the implementation of a preconceived master plan -- should be understood as both the precondition for the creation of Israel and the logical outcome of Zionist settlement in Palestine.

Moreover, it is this same logic that sustains the continuation of the Nakba today. As remarked by Benny Morris, “had he [David Ben Gurion] carried out full expulsion--rather than partial--he would have stabilised the State of Israel for generations.”[ii] Yet, plagued by an “instability”--defined by the very existence of the Palestinian nation--Israel continues its daily state practices in its quest to fulfill Zionism’s logic to maximize the amount of land under its control with the minimum number of Palestinians on it. These practices take a painful array of manifestations: aerial and maritime bombardment, massacre and invasion, house demolitions, land theft, identity card confiscation, racist laws and loyalty tests, the wall, the siege on Gaza, cultural appropriation, and the dependence on willing (or unwilling) native collaboration and security arrangements, all with the continued support and backing of imperial power. 

Despite these enduring practices however, the settler colonial paradigm has largely fallen into disuse. As a paradigm, it once served as a primary ideological and political framework for all Palestinian political factions and trends, and informed the intellectual work of committed academics and revolutionary scholars, both Palestinians and Jews.

The conference thus asks where and why the settler colonial paradigm was lost, both in scholarship on Palestine and in politics; how do current analyses and theoretical trends that have arisen in its place address present and historical realities? While acknowledging the creativity of these new interpretations, we must nonetheless ask: when exactly did Palestinian natives find themselves in a "post-colonial" condition? When did the ongoing struggle over land become a "post-conflict" situation? When did Israel become a "post-Zionist" society? And when did the fortification of Palestinian ghettos and reservations become "state-building"?

In outlining settler colonialism as a central paradigm from which to understand Palestine, this conference re-invigorates it as a tool by which to analyze the present situation. In doing so, it contests solutions which accommodate Zionism, and more significantly, builds settler colonialism as a political analysis that can embolden and inform a strategy of active, mutual, and principled Palestinian alignment with the Arab struggle for self-determination, and indigenous struggles in the US, Latin America, Oceania, and elsewhere.

Such an alignment would expand the tools available to Palestinians and their solidarity movement, and reconnect the struggle to its own history of anti-colonial internationalism. At its core, this internationalism asserts that the Palestinian struggle against Zionist settler colonialism can only be won when it is embedded within, and empowered by, the broader Arab movement for emancipation and the indigenous, anti-racist and anti-colonial movement--from Arizona to Auckland.

SOAS Palestine Society invites everyone to join us at what promises to be a significant intervention in Palestine activism and scholarship.

For over 30 years, SOAS Palestine Society has heightened awareness and understanding of the Palestinian people, their rights, culture, and struggle for self-determination, amongst students, faculty, staff, and the broader public. SOAS Palestine society aims to continuously push the frontiers of discourse in an effort to make provocative arguments and to stimulate debate and organizing for justice in Palestine through relevant conferences, and events ranging from the intellectual and political impact of Edward Said`s life and work (2004), international law and the Palestine question (2005), the economy of Palestine and its occupation (2006), the one state (2007), 60 Years of Nakba, 60 Years of Resistance (2009), and most recently, the Left in Palestine (2010).

For more information on the SOAS Palestine Society 7th annual conference, Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine: www.soaspalsoc.org

SOAS Palestine Society Organizing Collective is a group of committed students that has undertaken to organize annual academic conferences on Palestine since 2003.

 


[i] Patrick Wolfe, Settler Colonialism and the Transformation of Anthropology: The Politics and Poetics of an Ethnographic Event, Cassell, London, p. 163

[ii] Interview with Benny Morris, Survival of the Fittest, Haaretz, 9. January 2004, http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/art.php?aid=5412